The other
day I got two water boilers as birthday presents. The Braun Multiquick 3 is an
electrical powered water kettle for kitchen use and the Primus ETA Lite is a
backpacking stove running on canister gas. The manufacturers state their water
boilers abilities to boil water “fast”: 200 mL in 45 sec and 0,5 L in 2 min 45
sec respectively. Additionally, Primus states their ETA technology to achieve
efficiencies close to 80%.
Now, which one is the fastest, and what are their efficiencies?
Now, which one is the fastest, and what are their efficiencies?
To find out
I ran a series of tests[i] measuring
the time to boil various volumes of tap water. Then I calculated the energy
spent by the water boilers based on effect data submitted by the manufacturers,
and the energy absorbed by the water based on the water volumes and the
temperature gain.
Braun Multuquick 3
Volume
|
Time to Boil
|
Energy Spent
|
Energy Absorbed
|
Efficiency
|
(mL)
|
(s)
|
(J)
|
(J)
|
(%)
|
200
|
51
|
112200
|
71400
|
64
|
500
|
98
|
215600
|
178500
|
83
|
1000
|
197
|
433400
|
357000
|
82
|
1700
|
337
|
741400
|
606900
|
82
|
The time to
boil 200 ml water by the electrical powered water kettle from Braun was
measured to be 6 seconds (13%)
slower than stated and the mean efficiency was calculated to be 78%.
Primus ETA Lite
Volume
|
Time to Boil
|
Energy Spent
|
Energy Absorbed
|
Efficiency
|
(L)
|
(s)
|
(J)
|
(J)
|
(%)
|
100
|
34
|
51000
|
35700
|
70
|
200
|
64
|
96000
|
71400
|
74
|
300
|
97
|
145500
|
107100
|
74
|
400
|
134
|
201000
|
142800
|
71
|
500
|
171
|
256500
|
178500
|
70
|
The time to
boil 500 ml water by the gas powered backpacking stove from Primus was measured
to be 6 seconds (3.6%) slower than
stated and the mean efficiency was calculated to be 72% which is ballyard “close to 80%”
as stated by Primus.
Comparing
the two beasts at the two common data points, 200 mL and 500 mL, the electrical
device proved to be faster than the gas device by 13 seconds and 73 seconds
respectively. Similarly, the electrical device was the more efficient overall.
To sum up,
the water boilers appear to live up to manufacturer claims and they are both very
energy efficient.
Calculations
The energy
spent was calculated from the stated effects multiplied by the time to
boil:
Energy (Joule) = Effect (Watt) x Time (s)
Energy (Joule) = Effect (Watt) x Time (s)
The energy
absorbed was calculated from the water volume converted to weight multiplied by
the rise in temperature multiplied by calories converted to Joule:
Energy (Joule) = Volume (ml) x 1 g/ml x 85 (K) x 4.2 Joule/calorie.
The rise in water temperature was calculated from the boiling point of water minus the tap water temperature: 373K - 288K = 85K.
Energy (Joule) = Volume (ml) x 1 g/ml x 85 (K) x 4.2 Joule/calorie.
The rise in water temperature was calculated from the boiling point of water minus the tap water temperature: 373K - 288K = 85K.
Technical Data:
Braun
|
Primus
|
|
Maximum
capacity
|
1,7 L
|
0,5 L
|
Effect
|
2200 W
|
1500 W
|
Additional Data (stated for reference):
Room
temperature: 295K (22 °C)
Tap water
temperature: 278K (15 °C)
Atmospheric
pressure[ii]: 1020.4 hPa
Humidity[ii]: 80%
Elevation:
50 m
Gas: 20%
Isobutane, 80% Propane mixture from MSR.
Endnotes
[i] In order to cool down the water boilers between each boil they were filled with cold tap water three times and left to stand at least one minute each time.
[ii] Source:
Danish Meteorological Institute
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2014-11-10
Additional test
I visited my brother, Kåre the other day celebrating the birthday of his oldest son, Rasmus. Kåre has a MSR Reactor 1.0 L, a reversible vacuum cleaner and an anemometer. So we did a few boils while his guests were entertained otherwise:
The Reactor boiled 0.5 L of 12 C cold water in a bit less than 2 minutes at zero wind. Using a stated of 2750 Watt we calculated its efficiency to be 56%. Bear in mind the uncertainty of a one-point measurement and a stated value found on the Internet. However it is a bit low when compared to the 72% of the Primus ETA Lite. On wind stability: We found the Reactor stable up to at least 17 m/s when the anemometer maxed out. In comparison the Primus ETA Lite blew out at that wind speed, while it was ok at 5-6 m/s. These initial results call for a more thorough study. Will return.
Cheers!
Cheers!